The principal concerns Polman has raised in The Crisis Caravan are focuses on the actions of NGOs and whether or not those actions actually serve to achieve the NGO’s goals.
She said in her book that "Aid organizations are businesses dressed up like Mother Teresa", she was pointing out that those aid organizations are helping and aiding on the outside. They pretend that they are helping people as their main goal, but they are actually aiming to earn more money, expand and take more funding from the public at the same time.
Polman also pointed out that "that's [Aid organizations are businesses dressed up like Mother Teresa] not how reporters see them [aid organizations]". She suggested that journalists reports on what goes on on the surface, and that the journalists do not usually ask questions for aid organizations. Polman thinks that the media is not doing a good job or not critical enough when it comes to organizations "aiding". That made the NGOs to continue operate with benefits for themselves.
In order to make humanitarian aid successful, journalists, the public, governments has to improve their ways for doing their job.
For journalists, they need to report critically on the aiding process by the NGOs. It is good to report the whole process of how and where the money goes after the aid organizations have obtained the money. Journalists should provide the transparency of these process and reassure or even convince the public that the funding are in good hands and doing the right thing. Journalists should not be biased about what they report on, such as the organizations that they were funded by.
As for the public, Polman encouraged people should be more informed and educated before acting, such as to ask more questions and do some research before donating money to NGOs. Even for the more renowned NGOs, the public should not follow blindly. The public should understand what the organization do in terms of cultural, political, economical and social aspects.
For the governments, they need to be the administrative role to the NGOs. Even though they are ot funded or have any relations to the government. The government should ensure that the NGO's are doing their jobs ethically and are following guidelines. That is to prevent any corruption or irresponsible actions for the NGOs. The government should be responsible to ensure that the NGOs are strictly aiding and helping people, without any political backing.
Sunday, October 25, 2015
Humanitarians
Humanitarians - Costa Rica
According to Linda Polman, “humanitarians carry the integrity of their Red Cross principles
– neutrality, independence, and impartiality – before them like a shield and
think it is self-evident that the principles more important than their
consequences. “ Humanitarians are very
sensitive in every country. “Theirs is an ineluctable humanitarian duty, they
argue. They have no choice but to ease human suffering, even if the bad guys
benefit.” We found that humanitarians are not controlled easily. Humanitarians
seemed to be goodness, but the bad guys would also benefit from it.
In Costa Rica,
there is a non-profit foundation called the Costa Rican Humanitarian Foundation
that to develop creative and economical solutions to a wide range of social
problems. It mainly focuses on the
problem from young people. The organization would provide opportunities to
exchange friendship, goods, services, and financial resources for critical
needs among different cultures, socio-economic classes, and language groups. We
found that the organization would help avoid kinds of the social problem and
improve the education level for the young people. However, humanitarian would
still lead lots of social problem such as race, class and crime. I found that I researched Costa Rica
humanitarians” in google search, most of articles are the explanation and
description about Costa Rican Humanitarian Foundation. It could show that the
government pays lots of attention on the organization; in other words, the government
thinks that the taking care to the young people is the main mission for them
now. it could also show that the government attaches important to the young people
in Costa Rica.
There is an article
called 10 Costa Rica stories to watch in
2014 in The Tico Times online. It lists 10 main issues happened in Costa
Rica in 2014 which are interesting and some of them are relating to
humanitarian. They are tourism’s steady climb, what will become of Costa Rica’s
oceans, Costa Rica’s carbon-neutrality goals: myth or reality, Moin Port
expansion, is a Costa Rica primavera on the horizon, Border dispute: Costa Rica
vs. Nicaragua, can we just balance the budget already, will in vitro
fertilization finally become legal, will Costa Rica legalize illicit drugs and Costa
Rica heads back to the World Cup. These ten stories included the social issues
and environmental issues. The one I really want to point out that relating
humanitarian is will in vitro fertilization finally become legal. According to
the article, vitro fertilization is only illegal in Costa Rica in the western
hemisphere. There is a question that illegalizing for vitro fertilization is
protecting humanitarian or harming humanitarian. “The Inter-American Court of
Human Rights already has ruled that Costa Rica must grant its citizens access
to the procedure as a matter of human rights. The irony is that Costa Rica
fought for nearly a decade to headquarter the human rights’ court in San José.
President Laura Chinchilla also pushed for its legalization.” Human rights are
really important in the situation. Even though the government want to legalize
the vitro fertilization as other western countries, it must grant its citizens access to the procedure
to do the voting. However, as Costa Rica is still a traditional country, it’s
very difficult for them to legalize the vitro fertilization. For the voting
here, we could actually see the humanitarian.
References:
http://www.crhf.org/
http://www.ticotimes.net/2014/01/21/10-costa-rica-stories-to-watch-in-2014
Humanitarian Aid: Helpful or Hurtful?
As we have discovered in the past few weeks the subject of
humanitarian aid is a very sensitive one. Being a donor from half way
across the world it is convenient to avoid the negative consequences
of humanitarian aid. It is pretty easy to walk through
Speaker's circle and donate to an organization and feel that you have done a
good deed. But for me it has been very eye opening to see the other side
of the coin. It never even crossed my mind to think that in a situation
where humanitarian aid is required that the aid is dispersed to both
sides of the issue. In the perfect world that my brain creates I imagine
that the aid is given to the "good guys." But in war-torn areas
that could not be further from the truth. Both sides are
helped, but often times at a cost.
(The American Red Cross is one of many
humanitarian aid organizations)
I think that a main issue that Polman observes in
her book is how much of the aid is wasted. It is crazy that humanitarian aid
organizations are charged to enter war torn areas. These aid groups are
coming to help! The war chiefs that are setting the prices to enter must
have no regard for human rights, and be incredibly selfish. A chief is
supposed to serve as a leader, and look out for what is best for their people.
A chief should not be charging someone to enter to give help! Some
of the negotiations that Polman mentioned were ridiculous.
Polman mentioned one negotiation where a general wanted a promise
for a shopping spree and helicopter ride to the capitol for his wife.
Who thinks of such a thing and expects a humanitarian aid to actually
pull through with that? These men must be out of their mind, and full of
greed.
(Huts guard the entrance to an African village)
Another issue that Polman points out in regards to
humanitarian aid is that it has created an entire branch of the war economy
both for those in the war torn areas and the aid organizations themselves. She
mentions landlords jacking up prices in the places where the caravan needs to
stay. The housing market is just another way to create avenues for money to
travel to the wrong hands. On the other side of the issue is the aid organizations themselves
needing money. When Polman says, "Aid organizations are
businesses dressed up like Mother Teresa" I think that she is
making the claim that the organizations are no different from any
other business. Aid organizations are constantly trying to get money so
they can fund both the current issue, and the next issue. They use the
same tactics any other business would, and are often successful because
of the positive stereotypes that surround them. Pullman’s quote
simply brings this to light.
In order to make Humanitarian Aid successful a lot
needs to happen. For Journalists, they simply need to ask more questions.
If we get aid groups to be more transparent with where the money is going
this could get the ball rolling on some regulations for humanitarian aid.
The public needs to become more informed. I personally had no idea
that any of these issues were present until the past few weeks. I feel
this is probably a common theme among the majority of my peers. Finally,
the government needs to put regulations on aid. Aid should properly be
dispersed and be disallowed to countries that will steal aid money. I
think that currently humanitarian aid should be halted until something is done. It is an easy opinion to have given the current situation, but I think that if aid is halted it will provide a bigger incentive for everyone to pay more attention to the issue.
Is Humanitarian Aid Doing Its Job?
In Polman’s book, she addresses the
ulterior motives of charities and aid operations. She says that these
organizations have a commercial interest now. For example, by haphazardly
donating aid to persons in need, the Red Cross sustained Hutu extremists as they
carried out an extermination campaign against the Rwandan Tutsis. This is a huge issue that many people don't know about. We need to inform ourselves and our peers of these pressing issues. We need to shine the spotlight on them and talk about them. Talking about them is the first step in fixing the problem, we need people to see and understand what is so wrong about this issue.
(Picture of The American Red Cross volunteer helping out.)
She refers to aid organizations are
businesses dressed up like mother Teresa because they aren’t doing their job.
She says they’re more worried about their public figure. She says that most of
their aid is gone to waste. She focuses on the actions and goals of NGO’s and
reflects on whether those actions and goals are actually achieved by these
NGO’s. Polman says that these journalists don’t report below surface level. She
thinks that the media is not doing its job when it comes to reporting on these
organizations and their aiding methods.
(This picture shows the different types of roles NGO's can play. I think this is a great example of how NGO's can explain what they do, they just need to go one step further and put statistics and facts about the money and donations involved in these steps.)
I
think journalists need to dig deeper into these organizations, ask the
painfully truth staking questions that people have been too scared to ask. They
need to ask exactly how much money they are receiving and exactly where that
money is divided into going. I think the government needs to intervene as well
and become more managerial in these NGO’s in making sure they are actually
doing what they are supposed to be doing with all this money they are
gathering. Many people of this nation have no idea what is going on behind the
scenes, as I’m sure most people in this class and on this campus have no idea. I
think it’s important for the government or the NGO’s themselves to educate
people as to where the money is going and coming from. That way, people can
have a greater trust in them and be more willing to donate money because they
know exactly where it’s going to go.
(Cartoon of NGO's portraying how some are corrupt and some are not)
The
people also need to be more educated about these NGO’s before donating or
helping out these causes. We all think we’re doing a good job by donating, and
if we don’t know the corruption behind it then that is what we’ll believe. We
need to educate ourselves with this knowledge of how these NGO’s work. Although
NGO’s are non-government related, I still think the government has a duty to make
sure that at least the people of our nation know what is happening behind the
scenes.
Sunday, October 11, 2015
Costa Rica – human rights
Costa Rica – human rights
Chuqi Li
Dr. Elizabeth Lindsey discussed how the change of environment affects human rights and human’s
daily living through her video Ancient Wisdom for a Modern World. There are still few tribes in the world. People
in their tribes still live like an ancient person. Dr. Elizabeth Lindsey used
ancient wisdom to talk about how serious the environmental problems are. The
environmental problems are not only about the climate change and the pollution,
but also affecting the human rights in modern world. Honestly, Costa Rica is a
country in the Central America, which is not modern as the United States. To
compare to the United States, people in Costa Rica also looks like living in
“ancient”. People in Costa Rica enjoy living in nature environment instead of
modern city, just like what Dr. Elizabeth Lindsey discussed in the video. Human
rights are not working perfect all over the world. Every country has something
unfair happens every day.
Human rights always
relate to the politic system. “Costa Rica is a constitutional, multi-party
republic governed by a president and a unicameral legislative assembly directly
elected in multi-party elections every four years.” Every country’s political
has strong decision-making power to control the human rights in the country. “In
2010 voters chose Laura Chinchilla Miranda of the National Liberation Party
(PLN), the country’s first female president, in elections generally considered
free and fair.” Gender inequality is a social problem that relates directly
with human rights. However, the decision for choosing Laura Chinchilla Miranda
to be the president of the country helped the human rights be more fair and
free. It represented that the human rights policy become more and more
important. Costa Rica has strong development recently that may lead the human
rights develop quickly. On the other
hand, Costa Rica just chose their first female president in 2010, which is much
later than other “modern city”. Environmental problems lead the country Costa
Rica to be more “modern” and more developing.
“We now live in a global environment where cultures and civilizations
exist and interact closely with one another. In addition to furthering closer
contacts, this new phenomenon for the people and nations of the world has also
brought tension and conflict in the areas of culture, economics and politics. “
According to the Farish A. Noor’s Beyond Eurocentrism, the interactions between
countries would not really a good thing for a country. He used many cases and
examples in Europe to explain how many countries in Europe thought they were
the best. That would lead the cultural conflicts. If some countries in the
United States develops so quickly, it would easy have this kind of phenomenon
in the United States.
(Thousands marched for Human Rights in Costa Rica)
Even though it
seems that the human rights system integrate in Costa Rica, there are still
some human rights abuse cases. Sometimes the development is just apparent; it
seems like human systems are developing but deeply they aren’t. “Principal human rights abuses reported during
the year included harsh prison conditions and treatment, delays in the judicial
process, and domestic violence against women and children. Other human rights
problems included trafficking in persons, including sex trafficking of
children, and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”
It happens because of the cultural differences. Costa Rica is a traditional
country; the cultural development could not follow the speed of the development
of the economy and politic. Therefore, people in Costa Rica should be more care
of the human rights and become more free and fair.
Beyond Eurocentrism, Farish A. Noor
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)